tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2239062544101975016.post4546287222482128362..comments2024-03-28T14:05:25.134-07:00Comments on Sacnoth's Scriptorium: Lovecraft and The InklingsJohn D. Rateliffhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12324926298336489295noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2239062544101975016.post-57973725679930913802019-11-13T17:34:15.137-08:002019-11-13T17:34:15.137-08:00John, if you are a member-subscriber, you should h...John, if you are a member-subscriber, you should have received your Mallorn #59 a long time ago. I couldn't say to the day when my copy arrived, but around February or March of this year would be about right.<br /><br />Dale N.Wurmbrandhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17345523517796356674noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2239062544101975016.post-3214844097293815532019-11-11T12:08:38.620-08:002019-11-11T12:08:38.620-08:00MAGISTER wrote
"Surely that has been known f...MAGISTER wrote<br /><br />"Surely that has been known for decades? I first read that more than 20 years ago."<br /><br /><br />Dear M:<br />I learned of it when I published my piece on THE NIGHT LAND in July 2003. Once it was posted, I was told that, contrary to what I'd said in the column, conclusive evidence showed I was wrong. But I wasn't told what that evidence was, or where to find it, and I dislike using second-hand evidence. So coming across it now, while I'm revising my Hodgson piece, was a bit of an ah-ha! moment for me. <br /><br />--John R.<br /> John D. Rateliffhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12324926298336489295noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2239062544101975016.post-21106969720654268842019-11-11T11:56:08.067-08:002019-11-11T11:56:08.067-08:00Dear Wurmbrand
The most recent issue of MALLORN I...Dear Wurmbrand<br /><br />The most recent issue of MALLORN I have is #58 (Winter 2017), so I'll be looking forward to the next one's arrival and reading your piece therein.<br /><br />--John R.<br /><br /><br /><br />John D. Rateliffhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12324926298336489295noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2239062544101975016.post-4601847395827007052019-11-11T10:06:32.973-08:002019-11-11T10:06:32.973-08:00"On the other hand, in related work I've ..."On the other hand, in related work I've now been able to establish definitely that Lovecraft and Smith discovered the work of Hodgson in 1934."<br /><br />Surely that has been known for decades? I first read that more than 20 years ago.Magisterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07903799437411528229noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2239062544101975016.post-28293882832984190482019-11-10T17:41:21.388-08:002019-11-10T17:41:21.388-08:00John, I've assembled a lot of information on t...John, I've assembled a lot of information on the topic of the Lovecraft Circle and the Inklings (and the authors' awareness of each other) in an article published in Mallorn #59 (Winter 2018). I would say that it doesn't come to a whole lot, but it's more than is usually supposed. I imagine you have this issue. I'd be interested in your evaluation of my findings and observations there.<br /><br />Dale NelsonWurmbrandhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17345523517796356674noreply@blogger.com